The International Journal of Molecular Medicine and Advance Sciences (IJMMAS) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scientific quality, editorial independence, and publication ethics. The journal's editorial policies are designed to ensure that every manuscript is handled fairly, transparently, and efficiently while adhering to internationally recognized best practices in scholarly publishing. IJMMAS follows the recommendations and ethical principles of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and internationally accepted standards expected by major indexing databases.
Editorial decisions are made solely on the basis of the scientific quality, originality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, and relevance of the manuscript. Editors perform their duties independently and without influence from authors, institutions, sponsors, advertisers, funding agencies, or commercial organizations.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes an initial editorial screening to determine whether it falls within the journal's scope and complies with the journal's submission requirements. During this stage, editors evaluate manuscript completeness, formatting, ethical declarations, plagiarism screening results, authorship information, and overall scientific suitability before the manuscript proceeds to peer review.
IJMMAS manages a rigorous and confidential double-blind peer review process. Editors assign manuscripts to qualified independent reviewers with appropriate subject expertise while ensuring the absence of conflicts of interest.
Editors are responsible for:
Editorial decisions are based on reviewer recommendations together with the independent assessment of the handling editor and the Editor-in-Chief.
Following peer review, editors may make one of the following decisions:
Authors receive reviewer comments and editorial recommendations where appropriate. Final publication decisions are made by the Editor-in-Chief.
Editors oversee the revision process by ensuring that authors adequately address reviewer comments. Revised manuscripts may be returned to the original reviewers when additional evaluation is necessary before a final decision is reached.
Accepted manuscripts undergo professional proofreading and copyediting to improve grammar, language, consistency, formatting, references, and overall readability while preserving the scientific meaning of the work. Editors ensure that the final published version accurately reflects the approved manuscript.
The Editorial Office is responsible for organizing accepted manuscripts into scheduled journal issues. Articles are compiled according to the journal's publication schedule while maintaining balanced subject coverage, editorial quality, and publication consistency. The journal may also publish articles under a continuous publication model where applicable.
The Editorial Office provides guidance to authors throughout the submission, peer review, revision, and publication process. Assistance may include manuscript preparation, submission requirements, formatting guidance, ethical documentation, publication policies, and responses to technical or editorial inquiries.
Editors actively monitor compliance with publication ethics throughout the editorial process. Allegations involving plagiarism, duplicate publication, data fabrication, data falsification, image manipulation, inappropriate authorship, citation manipulation, or other forms of research misconduct are investigated in accordance with established editorial procedures and internationally recognized ethical guidance.
Editors, reviewers, and editorial staff must disclose any actual or potential conflicts of interest. Individuals with conflicts relating to a manuscript shall not participate in its editorial evaluation or decision-making process.
All manuscripts and associated editorial documents are treated as confidential. Editors, reviewers, and editorial staff must not disclose unpublished information or use confidential material for personal, academic, or commercial advantage.
Authors may submit appeals against editorial decisions or raise complaints regarding the editorial process. Appeals are reviewed independently by the Editor-in-Chief or an appropriate editorial representative. Every appeal is assessed fairly, objectively, and without bias.
Where significant errors or ethical issues are identified after publication, the journal may publish corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern to maintain the integrity and accuracy of the scholarly record.
The Editorial Office continuously monitors editorial performance to ensure consistency, transparency, efficiency, and compliance with international publishing standards. Editorial workflows, peer review procedures, and publication policies are periodically reviewed and updated to reflect current best practices in scholarly publishing.
IJMMAS is committed to following internationally recognized principles of responsible scholarly publishing, including the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), the ethical guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and recognized standards for quality, transparency, editorial independence, and research integrity expected by leading international indexing and abstracting services.