Bare-metal stents (BMS) historically served as the primary intervention for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, their high rates of in-stent restenosis (ISR) led to increased repeat revascularization procedures. Drug-eluting stents (DES) were introduced to reduce neointimal hyperplasia, but long-term comparative evidence, especially in multi-ethnic cohorts, remains limited. This retrospective cohort study examines 1,560 patients over a 7-year period to compare repeat revascularization between BMS and DES. Results indicate significantly lower target lesion revascularization (TLR) in DES (12.8%) versus BMS (38.4%) (p < 0.001). Poor glycemic control, smoking history, and multi-vessel disease were key predictors of repeat intervention. DES provide superior long-term clinical benefit and should remain first-line for PCI unless contraindicated.